When we allocate a nvme-tcp queue, we set the data_ready callback before
we actually need to use it. This creates the potential that if a stray
controller sends us data on the socket before we connect, we can trigger
the io_work and start consuming the socket.

In this case reported: we failed to allocate one of the io queues, and
as we start releasing the queues that we already allocated, we get
a UAF [1] from the io_work which is running before it should really.

Fix this by setting the socket ops callbacks only before we start the
queue, so that we can't accidentally schedule the io_work in the
initialization phase before the queue started. While we are at it,
rename nvme_tcp_restore_sock_calls to pair with nvme_tcp_setup_sock_ops.

[1]:
[16802.107284] nvme nvme4: starting error recovery
[16802.109166] nvme nvme4: Reconnecting in 10 seconds...
[16812.173535] nvme nvme4: failed to connect socket: -111
[16812.173745] nvme nvme4: Failed reconnect attempt 1
[16812.173747] nvme nvme4: Reconnecting in 10 seconds...
[16822.413555] nvme nvme4: failed to connect socket: -111
[16822.413762] nvme nvme4: Failed reconnect attempt 2
[16822.413765] nvme nvme4: Reconnecting in 10 seconds...
[16832.661274] nvme nvme4: creating 32 I/O queues.
[16833.919887] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000088
[16833.920068] nvme nvme4: Failed reconnect attempt 3
[16833.920094] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
[16833.920261] nvme nvme4: Reconnecting in 10 seconds...
[16833.920368] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
[16833.921086] Workqueue: nvme_tcp_wq nvme_tcp_io_work [nvme_tcp]
[16833.921191] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x17/0x30
...
[16833.923138] Call Trace:
[16833.923271]  <TASK>
[16833.923402]  lock_sock_nested+0x1e/0x50
[16833.923545]  nvme_tcp_try_recv+0x40/0xa0 [nvme_tcp]
[16833.923685]  nvme_tcp_io_work+0x68/0xa0 [nvme_tcp]
[16833.923824]  process_one_work+0x1e8/0x390
[16833.923969]  worker_thread+0x53/0x3d0
[16833.924104]  ? process_one_work+0x390/0x390
[16833.924240]  kthread+0x124/0x150
[16833.924376]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50
[16833.924518]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[16833.924655]  </TASK>
Reported-by: Yanjun Zhang <zhangyanjun@cestc.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Tested-by: Yanjun Zhang <zhangyanjun@cestc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>