-
Dave Chinner authored
The last thing we do before using call_rcu() on an xfs_inode to be freed is mark it as invalid. This means there is a window between when we know for certain that the inode is going to be freed and when we do actually mark it as "freed". This is important in the context of RCU lookups - we can look up the inode, find that it is valid, and then use it as such not realising that it is in the final stages of being freed. As such, mark the inode as being invalid the moment we know it is going to be reclaimed. This can be done while we still hold the XFS_ILOCK_EXCL and the flush lock in xfs_inode_reclaim, meaning that it occurs well before we remove it from the radix tree, and that the i_flags_lock, the XFS_ILOCK and the inode flush lock all act as synchronisation points for detecting that an inode is about to go away. For defensive purposes, this allows us to add a further check to xfs_iflush_cluster to ensure we skip inodes that are being freed after we grab the XFS_ILOCK_SHARED and the flush lock - we know that if the inode number if valid while we have these locks held we know that it has not progressed through reclaim to the point where it is clean and is about to be freed. [bfoster: fixed __xfs_inode_clear_reclaim() using ip->i_ino after it had already been zeroed.] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
8a17d7dd