-
Asias He authored
If we mod with VSOCK_HASH_SIZE -1, we get 0, 1, .... 249. Actually, we have vsock_bind_table[0 ... 250] and vsock_connected_table[0 .. 250]. In this case the last entry will never be used. We should mod with VSOCK_HASH_SIZE instead. Signed-off-by:
Asias He <asias@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Andy King <acking@vmware.com> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
a49dd9dc