If GuC is being used and we initialized GuC-error-capture,
we need to be warning if we don't provide an error-capture
register list in the firmware ADS, for valid GT engines.
A warning makes sense as this would impact debugability
without realizing why a reglist wasn't retrieved and reported
by GuC.

However, depending on the platform, we might have certain
engines that have a register list for engine instance error state
but not for engine class. Thus, add a check only to warn if the
register list was non existent vs an empty list (use the
empty lists to skip the warning).

NOTE: if a future platform were to introduce new registers
in place of what was an empty list on existing / legacy hardware
engines no warning is provided as the empty list is meant
to be used intentionally. As an example, if a future hardware
were to add blitter engine-class-registers (new) on top
of the legacy blitter engine-instance-register (HEAD, TAIL, etc.),
no warning is generated.
Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221019072930.17755-2-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com