-
Jeff Layton authored
dlm_posix_get fills out the relevant fields in the file_lock before returning when there is a lock conflict, but doesn't clean out any of the other fields in the file_lock. When nfsd does a NFSv4 lockt call, it sets the fl_lmops to nfsd_posix_mng_ops before calling the lower fs. When the lock comes back after testing a lock on GFS2, it still has that field set. This confuses nfsd into thinking that the file_lock is a nfsd4 lock. Fix this by making DLM reinitialize the file_lock before copying the fields from the conflicting lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
20d5a399