After changing the argument of __raw_xsave_addr() from a mask to
number Dave suggested to check if it makes sense to do the same for
get_xsave_addr(). As it turns out it does.

Only get_xsave_addr() needs the mask to check if the requested feature
is part of what is supported/saved and then uses the number again. The
shift operation is cheaper compared to fls64() (find last bit set).
Also, the feature number uses less opcode space compared to the mask. :)

Make the get_xsave_addr() argument a xfeature number instead of a mask
and fix up its callers.

Furthermore, use xfeature_nr and xfeature_mask consistently.

This results in the following changes to the kvm code:

  feature -> xfeature_mask
  index -> xfeature_nr
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Siarhei Liakh <Siarhei.Liakh@concurrent-rt.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403164156.19645-12-bigeasy@linutronix.de