There is a race condition between ucma_close() and ucma_resolve_ip():

CPU0				CPU1
ucma_resolve_ip():		ucma_close():

ctx = ucma_get_ctx(file, cmd.id);

        list_for_each_entry_safe(ctx, tmp, &file->ctx_list, list) {
                mutex_lock(&mut);
                idr_remove(&ctx_idr, ctx->id);
                mutex_unlock(&mut);
		...
                mutex_lock(&mut);
                if (!ctx->closing) {
                        mutex_unlock(&mut);
                        rdma_destroy_id(ctx->cm_id);
		...
                ucma_free_ctx(ctx);

ret = rdma_resolve_addr();
ucma_put_ctx(ctx);

Before idr_remove(), ucma_get_ctx() could still find the ctx
and after rdma_destroy_id(), rdma_resolve_addr() may still
access id_priv pointer. Also, ucma_put_ctx() may use ctx after
ucma_free_ctx() too.

ucma_close() should call ucma_put_ctx() too which tests the
refcnt and waits for the last one releasing it. The similar
pattern is already used by ucma_destroy_id().

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+da2591e115d57a9cbb8b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+cfe3c1e8ef634ba8964b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>