-
Rodrigo Vivi authored
Do not raise a WARN if we are likely within suspending or resuming path. This is likely this false positive: rpm_status: 0000:03:00.0 status=RPM_SUSPENDING console: xe_bo_evict_all (called from suspend) xe_sched_job_create: dev=0000:03:00.0, ... xe_sched_job_exec: dev=0000:03:00.0, ... xe_pm_runtime_put: dev=0000:03:00.0, ... xe_sched_job_run: dev=0000:03:00.0, ... rpm_usage: 0000:03:00.0 flags-0 cnt-2 ... rpm_usage: 0000:03:00.0 flags-0 cnt-2 ... rpm_usage: 0000:03:00.0 flags-0 cnt-2 ... console: xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Missing outer runtime PM protection console: xe_guc_ct_send+0x15/0x50 [xe] console: guc_exec_queue_run_job+0x1509/0x3950 [xe] [snip] console: drm_sched_run_job_work+0x649/0xc20 At this point, BOs are getting evicted from VRAM with rpm usage-counter = 2, but rpm status = SUSPENDING. The xe->pm_callback_task won't be equal 'current' because this call is coming from a work queue. So, pm_runtime_get_if_active() will be called and return 0 because rpm status != ACTIVE (but equal SUSPENDING or RESUMING). v2: Still get the reference even on non suspending/resuming path (Jonathan, Brost). Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240905140215.56404-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.comSigned-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (cherry picked from commit cb85e39dc5d1717fab82810984cce0e54712a3c2) Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
ad92f523