-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Make things a bit more explicit by splitting intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() into separate variants for M1/N1 vs. M2/N2. Makes the DRRS M/N programming at least more obvious. Note that for the MST and DRRS cases we don't need to call the M2/N2 variant at all since the transcoders that support those do not have the M2/N2 registers. Same could be said for i9xx_crtc_enable() but I want to do a higher level code sharing between that valleyview_crtc_enable() later in which case we do need the M2/N2 variant. This is also why I keep the transcoder_has_m2_n2() in intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m2_n2() so the caller doesn't have necessarily care what the chosen transcoder supports. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220128103757.22461-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
be0c94ee