With the current system of completed/pending events, things may get
handled in different order depending on which event triggers first. For
example, if the data transfer is complete before the command, the stop
command must be sent after the command is complete, not the data. This
creates a bit of complexity around the stop command.

By having the tasklet go through a sequence of clearly defined states,
things always happen in a certain order even if the events come at
different times, so the stop command can simply be sent when we exit the
"sending data" state because we will never enter that state before the
command has been sent successfully.
Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>