-
Steven Rostedt (VMware) authored
The return status check of __seq_open_private() is rather strange: iter = __seq_open_private(); if (iter) { /* do stuff */ } return iter ? 0 : -ENOMEM; It makes much more sense to do the return of failure right away: iter = __seq_open_private(); if (!iter) return -ENOMEM; /* do stuff */ return 0; This clean up will make updates to this code a bit nicer. Signed-off-by:
Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
c1bc5919