-
Athira Rajeev authored
When scheduling a group of events, there are constraint checks done to make sure all events can go in a group. Example, one of the criteria is that events in a group cannot use the same PMC. But platform specific PMU supports alternative event for some of the event codes. During perf_event_open(), if any event group doesn't match constraint check criteria, further lookup is done to find alternative event. By current design, the array of alternatives events in PMU code is expected to be sorted by column 0. This is because in find_alternative() the return criteria is based on event code comparison. ie. "event < ev_alt[i][0])". This optimisation is there since find_alternative() can be called multiple times. In power10 PMU code, the alternative event array is not sorted properly and hence there is breakage in finding alternative event. To work with existing logic, fix the alternative event array to be sorted by column 0 for power10-pmu.c Results: In case where an alternative event is not chosen when we could, events will be multiplexed. ie, time sliced where it could actually run concurrently. Example, in power10 PM_INST_CMPL_ALT(0x00002) has alternative event, PM_INST_CMPL(0x500fa). Without the fix, if a group of events with PMC1 to PMC4 is used along with PM_INST_CMPL_ALT, it will be time sliced since all programmable PMC's are consumed already. But with the fix, when it picks alternative event on PMC5, all events will run concurrently. Before: # perf stat -e r00002,r100fc,r200fa,r300fc,r400fc Performance counter stats for 'system wide': 328668935 r00002 (79.94%) 56501024 r100fc (79.95%) 49564238 r200fa (79.95%) 376 r300fc (80.19%) 660 r400fc (79.97%) 4.039150522 seconds time elapsed With the fix, since alternative event is chosen to run on PMC6, events will be run concurrently. After: # perf stat -e r00002,r100fc,r200fa,r300fc,r400fc Performance counter stats for 'system wide': 23596607 r00002 4907738 r100fc 2283608 r200fa 135 r300fc 248 r400fc 1.664671390 seconds time elapsed Fixes: a64e697c ("powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support") Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220419114828.89843-2-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
c6cc9a85