There are only two users of struct pci_platform_pm_ops in the tree,
one of which is Intel MID PM and the other one is ACPI.  They are
mutually exclusive and the MID PM should take precedence when they
both are enabled, but whether or not this really is the case hinges
on the specific ordering of arch_initcall() calls made by them.

The struct pci_platform_pm_ops abstraction is not really necessary
for just these two users, but it adds complexity and overhead because
of retoplines involved in using all of the function pointers in there.
It also makes following the code a bit more difficult than it would
be otherwise.

Moreover, Intel MID PCI PM doesn't even implement the majority of the
function pointers in struct pci_platform_pm_ops in a meaningful way,
so switch over the PCI core to calling the relevant MID PM routines,
mid_pci_set_power_state() and mid_pci_set_power_state(), directly as
needed and drop mid_pci_platform_pm.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>