-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
Regarding the .request case: The consumer might be interested in taking over the configured state from the boot loader. So the initially configured state should be retained. For the free case the PWM consumer is responsible for disabling the PWM before calling pwm_put() and there are three subcases to consider: a) The PWM is already off. Then there is no gain in disabling the PWM once more. b) The PWM is still running and there is a good reason for that. (Not sure this is a valid case, I cannot imagine such a good reason.) Then it is counterproductive to disable the PWM. c) The PWM is still running because the consumer failed to disable the PWM. Then the consumer needs fixing and there is little incentive to paper over the problem in the backend driver. This aligns the lpc18xx-sct driver to the other PWM drivers that also don't reconfigure the hardware in .request and .free. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
f82d15e2