-
Guilherme G. Piccoli authored
After inspection made by Markus using Coccinelle software, he observed that we could possibly be triggering a NULL pointer dereference in 2 functions [0]. After discussion in mailing list, it was observed in fact we have two unnecessary checks for NULL pointer, and they were leading to Coccinelle warn. So, instead of reworking the code as proposed by him, we hereby remove the unnecessary checks, and also some unneeded extra lines in the code. These two unnecessary NULL checks were tracked in the call chain as never NULL, so they can be safely removed. No functional changes are intended. [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/29/705Suggested-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
8ca31ba8