When destroying a queue, when calling sock_release, the network stack
might need to allocate an skb to send a FIN/RST. When that happens
during memory pressure, there is a need to reclaim memory, which
in turn may ask the nvme-tcp device to write out dirty pages, however
this is not possible due to a ctrl teardown that is going on.

Set PF_MEMALLOC to the task that releases the socket to grant access
to PF_MEMALLOC reserves. In addition, do the same for the nvme-tcp
thread as this may also originate from the swap itself and should
be more resilient to memory pressure situations.

This fixes the following lockdep complaint:
--
======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.0.0-rc2+ #25 Tainted: G        W
 ------------------------------------------------------
 kswapd0/92 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888114003240 (sk_lock-AF_INET-NVME){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendpage+0x23/0xa0

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffffffff97e95ca0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x987/0x10d0

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        fs_reclaim_acquire+0x11e/0x160
        kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x44/0x530
        __alloc_skb+0x158/0x230
        tcp_send_active_reset+0x7e/0x730
        tcp_disconnect+0x1272/0x1ae0
        __tcp_close+0x707/0xd90
        tcp_close+0x26/0x80
        inet_release+0xfa/0x220
        sock_release+0x85/0x1a0
        nvme_tcp_free_queue+0x1fd/0x470 [nvme_tcp]
        nvme_do_delete_ctrl+0x130/0x13d [nvme_core]
        nvme_sysfs_delete.cold+0x8/0xd [nvme_core]
        kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x356/0x530
        vfs_write+0x4e8/0xce0
        ksys_write+0xfd/0x1d0
        do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

 -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_INET-NVME){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2a0c/0x5690
        lock_acquire+0x18e/0x4f0
        lock_sock_nested+0x37/0xc0
        tcp_sendpage+0x23/0xa0
        inet_sendpage+0xad/0x120
        kernel_sendpage+0x156/0x440
        nvme_tcp_try_send+0x48a/0x2630 [nvme_tcp]
        nvme_tcp_queue_rq+0xefb/0x17e0 [nvme_tcp]
        __blk_mq_try_issue_directly+0x452/0x660
        blk_mq_plug_issue_direct.constprop.0+0x207/0x700
        blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x6f5/0xc70
        __blk_flush_plug+0x264/0x410
        blk_finish_plug+0x4b/0xa0
        shrink_lruvec+0x1263/0x1ea0
        shrink_node+0x736/0x1a80
        balance_pgdat+0x740/0x10d0
        kswapd+0x5f2/0xaf0
        kthread+0x256/0x2f0
        ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(sk_lock-AF_INET-NVME);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
  lock(sk_lock-AF_INET-NVME);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by kswapd0/92:
 #0: ffffffff97e95ca0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x987/0x10d0
 #1: ffff88811f21b0b0 (q->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x6b3/0xc70
 #2: ffff888170b11470 (&queue->send_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nvme_tcp_queue_rq+0xeb9/0x17e0 [nvme_tcp]

Fixes: 3f2304f8 ("nvme-tcp: add NVMe over TCP host driver")
Reported-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>