-
Jeffy Chen authored
Currently we are assuming a one to one mapping between dmabuf and GEM handle when releasing GEM handles. But that is not always true, since we would create extra handles for the GEM obj in cases like gem_open() and getfb{,2}(). A similar issue was reported at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211105083308.392156-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com/ Another problem is that the imported dmabuf might not always have gem_obj->dma_buf set, which would cause leaks in drm_gem_remove_prime_handles(). Let's fix these for now by using handle to find the exact map to remove. Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220819072834.17888-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com
ea2aa97c