• Kent Overstreet's avatar
    bcache: RESERVE_PRIO is too small by one when prio_buckets() is a power of two. · f0a89d79
    Kent Overstreet authored
    commit acc9cf8c upstream.
    
    This patch fixes a cachedev registration-time allocation deadlock.
    This can deadlock on boot if your initrd auto-registeres bcache devices:
    
    Allocator thread:
    [  720.727614] INFO: task bcache_allocato:3833 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
    [  720.732361]  [<ffffffff816eeac7>] schedule+0x37/0x90
    [  720.732963]  [<ffffffffa05192b8>] bch_bucket_alloc+0x188/0x360 [bcache]
    [  720.733538]  [<ffffffff810e6950>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0
    [  720.734137]  [<ffffffffa05302bd>] bch_prio_write+0x19d/0x340 [bcache]
    [  720.734715]  [<ffffffffa05190bf>] bch_allocator_thread+0x3ff/0x470 [bcache]
    [  720.735311]  [<ffffffff816ee41c>] ? __schedule+0x2dc/0x950
    [  720.735884]  [<ffffffffa0518cc0>] ? invalidate_buckets+0x980/0x980 [bcache]
    
    Registration thread:
    [  720.710403] INFO: task bash:3531 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
    [  720.715226]  [<ffffffff816eeac7>] schedule+0x37/0x90
    [  720.715805]  [<ffffffffa05235cd>] __bch_btree_map_nodes+0x12d/0x150 [bcache]
    [  720.716409]  [<ffffffffa0522d30>] ? bch_btree_insert_check_key+0x1c0/0x1c0 [bcache]
    [  720.717008]  [<ffffffffa05236e4>] bch_btree_insert+0xf4/0x170 [bcache]
    [  720.717586]  [<ffffffff810e6950>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0
    [  720.718191]  [<ffffffffa0527d9a>] bch_journal_replay+0x14a/0x290 [bcache]
    [  720.718766]  [<ffffffff810cc90d>] ? ttwu_do_activate.constprop.94+0x5d/0x70
    [  720.719369]  [<ffffffff810cf684>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x1d4/0x350
    [  720.719968]  [<ffffffffa05317d0>] run_cache_set+0x580/0x8e0 [bcache]
    [  720.720553]  [<ffffffffa053302e>] register_bcache+0xe2e/0x13b0 [bcache]
    [  720.721153]  [<ffffffff81354cef>] kobj_attr_store+0xf/0x20
    [  720.721730]  [<ffffffff812a2dad>] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x50
    [  720.722327]  [<ffffffff812a225a>] kernfs_fop_write+0x12a/0x180
    [  720.722904]  [<ffffffff81225177>] __vfs_write+0x37/0x110
    [  720.723503]  [<ffffffff81228048>] ? __sb_start_write+0x58/0x110
    [  720.724100]  [<ffffffff812cedb3>] ? security_file_permission+0x23/0xa0
    [  720.724675]  [<ffffffff812258a9>] vfs_write+0xa9/0x1b0
    [  720.725275]  [<ffffffff8102479c>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x6c/0x70
    [  720.725849]  [<ffffffff81226755>] SyS_write+0x55/0xd0
    [  720.726451]  [<ffffffff8106a390>] ? do_page_fault+0x30/0x80
    [  720.727045]  [<ffffffff816f2cae>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x71
    
    The fifo code in upstream bcache can't use the last element in the buffer,
    which was the cause of the bug: if you asked for a power of two size,
    it'd give you a fifo that could hold one less than what you asked for
    rather than allocating a buffer twice as big.
    Signed-off-by: default avatarKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
    Tested-by: default avatarEric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
    f0a89d79
super.c 50.2 KB