Having a 4 byte register at 0x321b seems unlikely as that's not
4 byte aligned. Since later platforms have more or less the same FBC
registers with new names, assume that FBC_FENCE_OFF is at 0x3218 just
like DPFC_FENCE_YOFF.

This feels like a simple typo in BSpec. 321Bh looks a lot like 3218h
after all.

Should still be tested on real hardware of course. But I don't have
any mobile gen4 systems.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>