-
Peter Zijlstra authored
commit 275d7d44 upstream. Poma (on the way to another bug) reported an assertion triggering: [<ffffffff81150529>] module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0x49/0x90 [<ffffffff81150822>] __module_address+0x32/0x150 [<ffffffff81150956>] __module_text_address+0x16/0x70 [<ffffffff81150f19>] symbol_put_addr+0x29/0x40 [<ffffffffa04b77ad>] dvb_frontend_detach+0x7d/0x90 [dvb_core] Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> produced a patch which lead us to inspect symbol_put_addr(). This function has a comment claiming it doesn't need to disable preemption around the module lookup because it holds a reference to the module it wants to find, which therefore cannot go away. This is wrong (and a false optimization too, preempt_disable() is really rather cheap, and I doubt any of this is on uber critical paths, otherwise it would've retained a pointer to the actual module anyway and avoided the second lookup). While its true that the module cannot go away while we hold a reference on it, the data structure we do the lookup in very much _CAN_ change while we do the lookup. Therefore fix the comment and add the required preempt_disable(). Reported-by: poma <pomidorabelisima@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Fixes: a6e6abd5 ("module: remove module_text_address()") Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (cherry picked from commit 3895ff2d) Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
ff948a77