Commit 01657bc1 authored by Robin Murphy's avatar Robin Murphy Committed by Joerg Roedel

iommu: Avoid races around device probe

We currently have 3 different ways that __iommu_probe_device() may be
called, but no real guarantee that multiple callers can't tread on each
other, especially once asynchronous driver probe gets involved. It would
likely have taken a fair bit of luck to hit this previously, but commit
57365a04 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device registration") ups
the odds since now it's not just omap-iommu that may trigger multiple
bus_iommu_probe() calls in parallel if probing asynchronously.

Add a lock to ensure we can't try to double-probe a device, and also
close some possible race windows to make sure we're truly robust against
trying to double-initialise a group via two different member devices.
Reported-by: default avatarBrian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Tested-by: default avatarBrian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Fixes: 57365a04 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device registration")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1946ef9f774851732eed78760a78ec40dbc6d178.1667591503.git.robin.murphy@arm.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
parent 69e61ede
...@@ -306,13 +306,23 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list ...@@ -306,13 +306,23 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
const struct iommu_ops *ops = dev->bus->iommu_ops; const struct iommu_ops *ops = dev->bus->iommu_ops;
struct iommu_device *iommu_dev; struct iommu_device *iommu_dev;
struct iommu_group *group; struct iommu_group *group;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(iommu_probe_device_lock);
int ret; int ret;
if (!ops) if (!ops)
return -ENODEV; return -ENODEV;
/*
if (!dev_iommu_get(dev)) * Serialise to avoid races between IOMMU drivers registering in
return -ENOMEM; * parallel and/or the "replay" calls from ACPI/OF code via client
* driver probe. Once the latter have been cleaned up we should
* probably be able to use device_lock() here to minimise the scope,
* but for now enforcing a simple global ordering is fine.
*/
mutex_lock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
if (!dev_iommu_get(dev)) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_unlock;
}
if (!try_module_get(ops->owner)) { if (!try_module_get(ops->owner)) {
ret = -EINVAL; ret = -EINVAL;
...@@ -333,11 +343,14 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list ...@@ -333,11 +343,14 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
ret = PTR_ERR(group); ret = PTR_ERR(group);
goto out_release; goto out_release;
} }
iommu_group_put(group);
mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
if (group_list && !group->default_domain && list_empty(&group->entry)) if (group_list && !group->default_domain && list_empty(&group->entry))
list_add_tail(&group->entry, group_list); list_add_tail(&group->entry, group_list);
mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
iommu_group_put(group);
mutex_unlock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
iommu_device_link(iommu_dev, dev); iommu_device_link(iommu_dev, dev);
return 0; return 0;
...@@ -352,6 +365,9 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list ...@@ -352,6 +365,9 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
err_free: err_free:
dev_iommu_free(dev); dev_iommu_free(dev);
err_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
return ret; return ret;
} }
...@@ -1824,11 +1840,11 @@ int bus_iommu_probe(struct bus_type *bus) ...@@ -1824,11 +1840,11 @@ int bus_iommu_probe(struct bus_type *bus)
return ret; return ret;
list_for_each_entry_safe(group, next, &group_list, entry) { list_for_each_entry_safe(group, next, &group_list, entry) {
mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
/* Remove item from the list */ /* Remove item from the list */
list_del_init(&group->entry); list_del_init(&group->entry);
mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
/* Try to allocate default domain */ /* Try to allocate default domain */
probe_alloc_default_domain(bus, group); probe_alloc_default_domain(bus, group);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment