Commit 018ad18f authored by Maxime Ripard's avatar Maxime Ripard

drm/atomic: Print the state every non-blocking commit

The DRM_UT_STATE controls whether we're calling
drm_atomic_print_new_state() whenever a new state is committed. However,
that call is made in the drm_mode_atomic_ioctl(), whereas we have
multiple users of the drm_atomic_commit() function in the kernel
(framebuffer emulation, drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb, etc.).

This leads to multiple states being committed but never actually
displayed even though we asked to have verbose atomic state debugging.

Let's move the call to drm_atomic_print_new_state() to
drm_atomic_commit() to make sure we don't miss any. Non-blocking commits
were never logged though, and it would create too much churn in the logs
to do so, so leave them out for now.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220328124304.2309418-2-maxime@cerno.tech
parent d049a24b
......@@ -1423,8 +1423,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_check_only);
int drm_atomic_commit(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
{
struct drm_mode_config *config = &state->dev->mode_config;
struct drm_printer p = drm_info_printer(state->dev->dev);
int ret;
if (drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_STATE))
drm_atomic_print_new_state(state, &p);
ret = drm_atomic_check_only(state);
if (ret)
return ret;
......
......@@ -1326,7 +1326,6 @@ int drm_mode_atomic_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_out_fence_state *fence_state;
int ret = 0;
unsigned int i, j, num_fences;
struct drm_printer p = drm_info_printer(dev->dev);
/* disallow for drivers not supporting atomic: */
if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_ATOMIC))
......@@ -1458,9 +1457,6 @@ int drm_mode_atomic_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
} else if (arg->flags & DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_NONBLOCK) {
ret = drm_atomic_nonblocking_commit(state);
} else {
if (drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_STATE))
drm_atomic_print_new_state(state, &p);
ret = drm_atomic_commit(state);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment