[PATCH] Re: [PATCH] fix sector_div use in scsicam.c
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:50:53AM +0100, Andries Brouwer wrote: > On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:05:07PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > > > If the return type will be ignored by most applications, I don't see > > what the problem is. > > There is no problem. My longish reaction was mostly because you used > "future proofing", that gave the impression that you did not know > what this is about. > > > (like an obviously wrong truncation) > > No, the code I wrote was optimal. > If you have 16 bits and the value is 70000, I prefer returning > 65535 over 4464. Why didn't you write is as patch? James, this in Andries code in patch from, it get's rid of the ugly sector_div so it should be in if not just because of that.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment