Commit 01f810ac authored by Andrei Matei's avatar Andrei Matei Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access

Before this patch, variable offset access to the stack was dissalowed
for regular instructions, but was allowed for "indirect" accesses (i.e.
helpers). This patch removes the restriction, allowing reading and
writing to the stack through stack pointers with variable offsets. This
makes stack-allocated buffers more usable in programs, and brings stack
pointers closer to other types of pointers.

The motivation is being able to use stack-allocated buffers for data
manipulation. When the stack size limit is sufficient, allocating
buffers on the stack is simpler than per-cpu arrays, or other
alternatives.

In unpriviledged programs, variable-offset reads and writes are
disallowed (they were already disallowed for the indirect access case)
because the speculative execution checking code doesn't support them.
Additionally, when writing through a variable-offset stack pointer, if
any pointers are in the accessible range, there's possilibities of later
leaking pointers because the write cannot be tracked precisely.

Writes with variable offset mark the whole range as initialized, even
though we don't know which stack slots are actually written. This is in
order to not reject future reads to these slots. Note that this doesn't
affect writes done through helpers; like before, helpers need the whole
stack range to be initialized to begin with.
All the stack slots are in range are considered scalars after the write;
variable-offset register spills are not tracked.

For reads, all the stack slots in the variable range needs to be
initialized (but see above about what writes do), otherwise the read is
rejected. All register spilled in stack slots that might be read are
marked as having been read, however reads through such pointers don't do
register filling; the target register will always be either a scalar or
a constant zero.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210207011027.676572-2-andreimatei1@gmail.com
parent ee5cc036
......@@ -1290,6 +1290,11 @@ static inline bool bpf_allow_ptr_leaks(void)
return perfmon_capable();
}
static inline bool bpf_allow_uninit_stack(void)
{
return perfmon_capable();
}
static inline bool bpf_allow_ptr_to_map_access(void)
{
return perfmon_capable();
......
......@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ struct bpf_func_state {
* 0 = main function, 1 = first callee.
*/
u32 frameno;
/* subprog number == index within subprog_stack_depth
/* subprog number == index within subprog_info
* zero == main subprog
*/
u32 subprogno;
......@@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env {
u32 used_btf_cnt; /* number of used BTF objects */
u32 id_gen; /* used to generate unique reg IDs */
bool allow_ptr_leaks;
bool allow_uninit_stack;
bool allow_ptr_to_map_access;
bool bpf_capable;
bool bypass_spec_v1;
......
This diff is collapsed.
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment