Commit 02d21168 authored by Andrew Morton's avatar Andrew Morton Committed by Linus Torvalds

revert "percpu_counter: new function percpu_counter_sum_and_set"

Revert

    commit e8ced39d
    Author: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
    Date:   Fri Jul 11 19:27:31 2008 -0400

        percpu_counter: new function percpu_counter_sum_and_set

As described in

	revert "percpu counter: clean up percpu_counter_sum_and_set()"

the new percpu_counter_sum_and_set() is racy against updates to the
cpu-local accumulators on other CPUs.  Revert that change.

This means that ext4 will be slow again.  But correct.
Reported-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>		[2.6.27.x]
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 71c5576f
......@@ -609,8 +609,8 @@ int ext4_has_free_blocks(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, s64 nblocks)
if (free_blocks - (nblocks + root_blocks + dirty_blocks) <
EXT4_FREEBLOCKS_WATERMARK) {
free_blocks = percpu_counter_sum_and_set(fbc);
dirty_blocks = percpu_counter_sum_and_set(dbc);
free_blocks = percpu_counter_sum_positive(fbc);
dirty_blocks = percpu_counter_sum_positive(dbc);
if (dirty_blocks < 0) {
printk(KERN_CRIT "Dirty block accounting "
"went wrong %lld\n",
......
......@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ int percpu_counter_init_irq(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch);
s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc, int set);
s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
{
......@@ -44,19 +44,13 @@ static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_positive(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
{
s64 ret = __percpu_counter_sum(fbc, 0);
s64 ret = __percpu_counter_sum(fbc);
return ret < 0 ? 0 : ret;
}
static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_and_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
{
return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc, 1);
}
static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
{
return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc, 0);
return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc);
}
static inline s64 percpu_counter_read(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
......
......@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_add);
* Add up all the per-cpu counts, return the result. This is a more accurate
* but much slower version of percpu_counter_read_positive()
*/
s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc, int set)
s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
{
s64 ret;
int cpu;
......@@ -62,12 +62,7 @@ s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc, int set)
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
s32 *pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu);
ret += *pcount;
if (set)
*pcount = 0;
}
if (set)
fbc->count = ret;
spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment