Commit 0422e83d authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson Committed by Ingo Molnar

locking/ww_mutex: Report recursive ww_mutex locking early

Recursive locking for ww_mutexes was originally conceived as an
exception. However, it is heavily used by the DRM atomic modesetting
code. Currently, the recursive deadlock is checked after we have queued
up for a busy-spin and as we never release the lock, we spin until
kicked, whereupon the deadlock is discovered and reported.

A simple solution for the now common problem is to move the recursive
deadlock discovery to the first action when taking the ww_mutex.
Suggested-by: default avatarMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464293297-19777-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 55eed755
......@@ -486,9 +486,6 @@ __ww_mutex_lock_check_stamp(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
if (!hold_ctx)
return 0;
if (unlikely(ctx == hold_ctx))
return -EALREADY;
if (ctx->stamp - hold_ctx->stamp <= LONG_MAX &&
(ctx->stamp != hold_ctx->stamp || ctx > hold_ctx)) {
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
......@@ -514,6 +511,12 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
if (use_ww_ctx) {
struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
if (unlikely(ww_ctx == READ_ONCE(ww->ctx)))
return -EALREADY;
}
preempt_disable();
mutex_acquire_nest(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, nest_lock, ip);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment