Commit 049f8e2e authored by Alexander Duyck's avatar Alexander Duyck Committed by Steffen Klassert

xfrm: Override skb->mark with tunnel->parm.i_key in xfrm_input

This change makes it so that if a tunnel is defined we just use the mark
from the tunnel instead of the mark from the skb header.  By doing this we
can avoid the need to set skb->mark inside of the tunnel receive functions.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
parent cd5279c1
......@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
#include <net/dst.h>
#include <net/ip.h>
#include <net/xfrm.h>
#include <net/ip_tunnels.h>
#include <net/ip6_tunnel.h>
static struct kmem_cache *secpath_cachep __read_mostly;
......@@ -186,6 +188,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
struct xfrm_state *x = NULL;
xfrm_address_t *daddr;
struct xfrm_mode *inner_mode;
u32 mark = skb->mark;
unsigned int family;
int decaps = 0;
int async = 0;
......@@ -203,6 +206,18 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->daddroff);
family = XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->family;
/* if tunnel is present override skb->mark value with tunnel i_key */
if (XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip4) {
switch (family) {
case AF_INET:
mark = be32_to_cpu(XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip4->parms.i_key);
break;
case AF_INET6:
mark = be32_to_cpu(XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip6->parms.i_key);
break;
}
}
/* Allocate new secpath or COW existing one. */
if (!skb->sp || atomic_read(&skb->sp->refcnt) != 1) {
struct sec_path *sp;
......@@ -229,7 +244,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
goto drop;
}
x = xfrm_state_lookup(net, skb->mark, daddr, spi, nexthdr, family);
x = xfrm_state_lookup(net, mark, daddr, spi, nexthdr, family);
if (x == NULL) {
XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINNOSTATES);
xfrm_audit_state_notfound(skb, family, spi, seq);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment