Commit 0a0ba1c9 authored by Paul E. McKenney's avatar Paul E. McKenney

rcu: Adjust ->lock acquisition for tasks no longer migrating

Tasks are no longer migrated away from a given rcu_node structure
when all CPUs corresponding to that rcu_node structure have gone offline.
This means that rcu_read_unlock_special() no longer needs to loop
retrying rcu_node ->lock acquisition because the current task is
guaranteed to stay put.

This commit takes a small and paranoid step towards relying on this
guarantee by placing a WARN_ON_ONCE() just after the early exit from
the lock-acquisition loop.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
parent ea46351c
......@@ -307,9 +307,11 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked = false;
/*
* Remove this task from the list it blocked on. The
* task can migrate while we acquire the lock, but at
* most one time. So at most two passes through loop.
* Remove this task from the list it blocked on. The task
* now remains queued on the rcu_node corresponding to
* the CPU it first blocked on, so the first attempt to
* acquire the task's rcu_node's ->lock will succeed.
* Keep the loop and add a WARN_ON() out of sheer paranoia.
*/
for (;;) {
rnp = t->rcu_blocked_node;
......@@ -317,6 +319,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
if (rnp == t->rcu_blocked_node)
break;
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
}
empty_norm = !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment