Commit 0a38806f authored by Soheil Hassas Yeganeh's avatar Soheil Hassas Yeganeh Committed by David S. Miller

net: revert "Update RFS target at poll for tcp/udp"

On multi-threaded processes, one common architecture is to have
one (or a small number of) threads polling sockets, and a
considerably larger pool of threads reading form and writing to the
sockets. When we set RPS core on tcp_poll() or udp_poll() we essentially
steer all packets of all the polled FDs to one (or small number of)
cores, creaing a bottleneck and/or RPS misprediction.

Another common architecture is to shard FDs among threads pinned
to cores. In such a setting, setting RPS core in tcp_poll() and
udp_poll() is redundant because the RFS core is correctly
set in recvmsg and sendmsg.

Thus, revert the following commit:
c3f1dbaf ("net: Update RFS target at poll for tcp/udp").
Signed-off-by: default avatarSoheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent e3f2c4a3
......@@ -498,8 +498,6 @@ unsigned int tcp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait)
const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
int state;
sock_rps_record_flow(sk);
sock_poll_wait(file, sk_sleep(sk), wait);
state = inet_sk_state_load(sk);
......
......@@ -2490,8 +2490,6 @@ unsigned int udp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait)
if (!skb_queue_empty(&udp_sk(sk)->reader_queue))
mask |= POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
sock_rps_record_flow(sk);
/* Check for false positives due to checksum errors */
if ((mask & POLLRDNORM) && !(file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) &&
!(sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) && first_packet_length(sk) == -1)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment