Commit 0a9afeda authored by Robin Murphy's avatar Robin Murphy Committed by Joerg Roedel

iommu/dma: Avoid unlikely high-order allocations

Doug reports that the equivalent page allocator on 32-bit ARM exhibits
particularly pathalogical behaviour under memory pressure when
fragmentation is high, where allocating a 4MB buffer takes tens of
seconds and the number of calls to alloc_pages() is over 9000![1]

We can drastically improve that situation without losing the other
benefits of high-order allocations when they would succeed, by assuming
memory pressure is relatively constant over the course of an allocation,
and not retrying allocations at orders we know to have failed before.
This way, the best-case behaviour remains unchanged, and in the worst
case we should see at most a dozen or so (MAX_ORDER - 1) failed attempts
before falling back to single pages for the remainder of the buffer.

[1]:http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-December/394660.htmlReported-by: default avatarDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
parent 5b11e9cd
......@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static struct page **__iommu_dma_alloc_pages(unsigned int count, gfp_t gfp)
{
struct page **pages;
unsigned int i = 0, array_size = count * sizeof(*pages);
unsigned int order = MAX_ORDER;
if (array_size <= PAGE_SIZE)
pages = kzalloc(array_size, GFP_KERNEL);
......@@ -207,14 +208,15 @@ static struct page **__iommu_dma_alloc_pages(unsigned int count, gfp_t gfp)
while (count) {
struct page *page = NULL;
int j, order = __fls(count);
int j;
/*
* Higher-order allocations are a convenience rather
* than a necessity, hence using __GFP_NORETRY until
* falling back to single-page allocations.
*/
for (order = min(order, MAX_ORDER); order > 0; order--) {
for (order = min_t(unsigned int, order, __fls(count));
order > 0; order--) {
page = alloc_pages(gfp | __GFP_NORETRY, order);
if (!page)
continue;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment