Commit 0aa99c4d authored by J. Bruce Fields's avatar J. Bruce Fields

sunrpc: simplify do_cache_clean

Is it just me, or is the logic written in a slightly convoluted way?

I find it a little easier to read this way.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
parent 9dbc1f45
...@@ -498,16 +498,17 @@ static int cache_clean(void) ...@@ -498,16 +498,17 @@ static int cache_clean(void)
*/ */
static void do_cache_clean(struct work_struct *work) static void do_cache_clean(struct work_struct *work)
{ {
int delay = 5; int delay;
if (cache_clean() == -1)
delay = round_jiffies_relative(30*HZ);
if (list_empty(&cache_list)) if (list_empty(&cache_list))
delay = 0; return;
if (cache_clean() == -1)
delay = round_jiffies_relative(30*HZ);
else
delay = 5;
if (delay) queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &cache_cleaner, delay);
queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
&cache_cleaner, delay);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment