Commit 0aba5247 authored by Justin Stitt's avatar Justin Stitt Committed by Jakub Kicinski

bcm63xx_enet: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy

strncpy() is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
[1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
interfaces.

A suitable replacement is strscpy() [2] due to the fact that it
guarantees NUL-termination on the destination buffer without
unnecessarily NUL-padding.

bcm_enet_get_drvinfo() already uses strscpy(), let's match it's
implementation:
|       static void bcm_enet_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *netdev,
|       				 struct ethtool_drvinfo *drvinfo)
|       {
|       	strscpy(drvinfo->driver, bcm_enet_driver_name, sizeof(drvinfo->driver));
|       	strscpy(drvinfo->bus_info, "bcm63xx", sizeof(drvinfo->bus_info));
|       }

Note that now bcm_enet_get_drvinfo() and bcm_enetsw_get_drvinfo() do the
exact same thing.

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings [1]
Link: https://manpages.debian.org/testing/linux-manual-4.8/strscpy.9.en.html [2]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90Signed-off-by: default avatarJustin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005-strncpy-drivers-net-ethernet-broadcom-bcm63xx_enet-c-v1-1-6823b3c3c443@google.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent 19537e12
......@@ -2530,8 +2530,8 @@ static int bcm_enetsw_get_sset_count(struct net_device *netdev,
static void bcm_enetsw_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *netdev,
struct ethtool_drvinfo *drvinfo)
{
strncpy(drvinfo->driver, bcm_enet_driver_name, sizeof(drvinfo->driver));
strncpy(drvinfo->bus_info, "bcm63xx", sizeof(drvinfo->bus_info));
strscpy(drvinfo->driver, bcm_enet_driver_name, sizeof(drvinfo->driver));
strscpy(drvinfo->bus_info, "bcm63xx", sizeof(drvinfo->bus_info));
}
static void bcm_enetsw_get_ethtool_stats(struct net_device *netdev,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment