Commit 0b7f12be authored by Linus Torvalds's avatar Linus Torvalds Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

userfaultfd: don't block on the last VM updates at exit time

commit 39680f50 upstream.

The exit path will do some final updates to the VM of an exiting process
to inform others of the fact that the process is going away.

That happens, for example, for robust futex state cleanup, but also if
the parent has asked for a TID update when the process exits (we clear
the child tid field in user space).

However, at the time we do those final VM accesses, we've already
stopped accepting signals, so the usual "stop waiting for userfaults on
signal" code in fs/userfaultfd.c no longer works, and the process can
become an unkillable zombie waiting for something that will never
happen.

To solve this, just make handle_userfault() abort any user fault
handling if we're already in the exit path past the signal handling
state being dead (marked by PF_EXITING).

This VM special case is pretty ugly, and it is possible that we should
look at finalizing signals later (or move the VM final accesses
earlier).  But in the meantime this is a fairly minimally intrusive fix.
Reported-and-tested-by: default avatarDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Acked-by: default avatarAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 6175c8fd
...@@ -286,6 +286,12 @@ int handle_userfault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, ...@@ -286,6 +286,12 @@ int handle_userfault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(ctx->released))) if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(ctx->released)))
goto out; goto out;
/*
* We don't do userfault handling for the final child pid update.
*/
if (current->flags & PF_EXITING)
goto out;
/* /*
* Check that we can return VM_FAULT_RETRY. * Check that we can return VM_FAULT_RETRY.
* *
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment