Commit 0bbca609 authored by Karthik B S's avatar Karthik B S Committed by Ville Syrjälä

drm/i915: Do not call drm_crtc_arm_vblank_event in async flips

Since the flip done event will be sent in the flip_done_handler,
no need to add the event to the list and delay it for later.

v2: -Moved the async check above vblank_get as it
     was causing issues for PSR.

v3: -No need to wait for vblank to pass, as this wait was causing a
     16ms delay once every few flips.

v4: -Rebased.

v5: -Rebased.

v6: -Rebased.

v7: -No need of irq disable if we are not doing vblank evade. (Ville)

v8: -Rebased.

v9: -Move the return in intel_pipe_update_end before tracepoint. (Ville)

v10: Rebased.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKarthik B S <karthik.b.s@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200921110210.21182-5-karthik.b.s@intel.com
parent 30ff93af
......@@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
u32 psr_status;
if (new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip)
return;
vblank_start = adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start;
if (adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
vblank_start = DIV_ROUND_UP(vblank_start, 2);
......@@ -200,6 +203,9 @@ void intel_pipe_update_end(struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
ktime_t end_vbl_time = ktime_get();
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
if (new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip)
return;
trace_intel_pipe_update_end(crtc, end_vbl_count, scanline_end);
/* We're still in the vblank-evade critical section, this can't race.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment