Commit 0c7462a2 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by David S. Miller

ipv4: remove rt_cache_rebuild_count

After IP route cache removal, rt_cache_rebuild_count is no longer
used.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 404e0a8b
......@@ -48,12 +48,6 @@ min_adv_mss - INTEGER
The advertised MSS depends on the first hop route MTU, but will
never be lower than this setting.
rt_cache_rebuild_count - INTEGER
The per net-namespace route cache emergency rebuild threshold.
Any net-namespace having its route cache rebuilt due to
a hash bucket chain being too long more than this many times
will have its route caching disabled
IP Fragmentation:
ipfrag_high_thresh - INTEGER
......
......@@ -61,8 +61,6 @@ struct netns_ipv4 {
int sysctl_icmp_ratelimit;
int sysctl_icmp_ratemask;
int sysctl_icmp_errors_use_inbound_ifaddr;
int sysctl_rt_cache_rebuild_count;
int current_rt_cache_rebuild_count;
unsigned int sysctl_ping_group_range[2];
long sysctl_tcp_mem[3];
......
......@@ -783,13 +783,6 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_net_table[] = {
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = proc_dointvec
},
{
.procname = "rt_cache_rebuild_count",
.data = &init_net.ipv4.sysctl_rt_cache_rebuild_count,
.maxlen = sizeof(int),
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = proc_dointvec
},
{
.procname = "ping_group_range",
.data = &init_net.ipv4.sysctl_ping_group_range,
......@@ -829,8 +822,6 @@ static __net_init int ipv4_sysctl_init_net(struct net *net)
table[5].data =
&net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_ratemask;
table[6].data =
&net->ipv4.sysctl_rt_cache_rebuild_count;
table[7].data =
&net->ipv4.sysctl_ping_group_range;
}
......@@ -842,8 +833,6 @@ static __net_init int ipv4_sysctl_init_net(struct net *net)
net->ipv4.sysctl_ping_group_range[0] = 1;
net->ipv4.sysctl_ping_group_range[1] = 0;
net->ipv4.sysctl_rt_cache_rebuild_count = 4;
tcp_init_mem(net);
net->ipv4.ipv4_hdr = register_net_sysctl(net, "net/ipv4", table);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment