Commit 0fb0624b authored by Randy Dunlap's avatar Randy Dunlap Committed by Kees Cook

seccomp: fix kernel-doc function name warning

Move the ACTION_ONLY() macro so that it is not between the kernel-doc
notation and the function definition for seccomp_run_filters(),
eliminating a kernel-doc warning:

kernel/seccomp.c:400: warning: expecting prototype for seccomp_run_filters(). Prototype was for ACTION_ONLY() instead
Signed-off-by: default avatarRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230108021228.15975-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
parent 88603b6d
......@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_allow(const struct seccomp_filter *sfilte
}
#endif /* SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE */
#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
/**
* seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @sd
* @sd: optional seccomp data to be passed to filters
......@@ -397,7 +398,6 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_allow(const struct seccomp_filter *sfilte
*
* Returns valid seccomp BPF response codes.
*/
#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd,
struct seccomp_filter **match)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment