mm/smaps: fix shmem pte hole swap calculation
Patch series "mm/smaps: Fixes and optimizations on shmem swap handling". This patch (of 3): The shmem swap calculation on the privately writable mappings are using wrong parameters as spotted by Vlastimil. Fix them. This was introduced in commit 48131e03 ("mm, proc: reduce cost of /proc/pid/smaps for unpopulated shmem mappings"), when shmem_swap_usage was reworked to shmem_partial_swap_usage. Test program: void main(void) { char *buffer, *p; int i, fd; fd = memfd_create("test", 0); assert(fd > 0); /* isize==2M*3, fill in pages, swap them out */ ftruncate(fd, SIZE_2M * 3); buffer = mmap(NULL, SIZE_2M * 3, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); assert(buffer); for (i = 0, p = buffer; i < SIZE_2M * 3 / 4096; i++) { *p = 1; p += 4096; } madvise(buffer, SIZE_2M * 3, MADV_PAGEOUT); munmap(buffer, SIZE_2M * 3); /* * Remap with private+writtable mappings on partial of the inode (<= 2M*3), * while the size must also be >= 2M*2 to make sure there's a none pmd so * smaps_pte_hole will be triggered. */ buffer = mmap(NULL, SIZE_2M * 2, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0); printf("pid=%d, buffer=%p\n", getpid(), buffer); /* Check /proc/$PID/smap_rollup, should see 4MB swap */ sleep(1000000); } Before the patch, smaps_rollup shows <4MB swap and the number will be random depending on the alignment of the buffer of mmap() allocated. After this patch, it'll show 4MB. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210917164756.8586-1-peterx@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210917164756.8586-2-peterx@redhat.com Fixes: 48131e03 ("mm, proc: reduce cost of /proc/pid/smaps for unpopulated shmem mappings") Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reported-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment