Commit 116c76c5 authored by Ariel Levkovich's avatar Ariel Levkovich Committed by Saeed Mahameed

net/mlx5: CT: Add support for matching on ct_state inv and rel flags

Add support for matching on ct_state inv and rel flags.

Currently the support is only for match on -inv and -rel.
Matching on +inv and +rel will be rejected.

Example:
$ tc filter add dev ens1f0_0 ingress prio 1 chain 1 proto ip flower \
  ct_state -est-rel+trk \
  action mirred egress redirect dev ens1f0_1
$ tc filter add dev ens1f0_1 ingress prio 1 chain 1 proto ip flower \
  ct_state +trk+est-inv \
  action mirred egress redirect dev ens1f0_0
Signed-off-by: default avatarAriel Levkovich <lariel@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
parent bd78980b
......@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
#define MLX5_CT_STATE_TRK_BIT BIT(2)
#define MLX5_CT_STATE_NAT_BIT BIT(3)
#define MLX5_CT_STATE_REPLY_BIT BIT(4)
#define MLX5_CT_STATE_RELATED_BIT BIT(5)
#define MLX5_CT_STATE_INVALID_BIT BIT(6)
#define MLX5_FTE_ID_BITS (mlx5e_tc_attr_to_reg_mappings[FTEID_TO_REG].mlen * 8)
#define MLX5_FTE_ID_MAX GENMASK(MLX5_FTE_ID_BITS - 1, 0)
......@@ -1207,8 +1209,8 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_match_add(struct mlx5_tc_ct_priv *priv,
struct mlx5_ct_attr *ct_attr,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
bool trk, est, untrk, unest, new, rpl, unrpl, rel, unrel, inv, uninv;
struct flow_rule *rule = flow_cls_offload_flow_rule(f);
bool trk, est, untrk, unest, new, rpl, unrpl;
struct flow_dissector_key_ct *mask, *key;
u32 ctstate = 0, ctstate_mask = 0;
u16 ct_state_on, ct_state_off;
......@@ -1236,7 +1238,9 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_match_add(struct mlx5_tc_ct_priv *priv,
if (ct_state_mask & ~(TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_TRACKED |
TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_ESTABLISHED |
TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_NEW |
TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_REPLY)) {
TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_REPLY |
TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_RELATED |
TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_INVALID)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
"only ct_state trk, est, new and rpl are supported for offload");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
......@@ -1248,9 +1252,13 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_match_add(struct mlx5_tc_ct_priv *priv,
new = ct_state_on & TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_NEW;
est = ct_state_on & TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_ESTABLISHED;
rpl = ct_state_on & TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_REPLY;
rel = ct_state_on & TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_RELATED;
inv = ct_state_on & TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_INVALID;
untrk = ct_state_off & TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_TRACKED;
unest = ct_state_off & TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_ESTABLISHED;
unrpl = ct_state_off & TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_REPLY;
unrel = ct_state_off & TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_RELATED;
uninv = ct_state_off & TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_INVALID;
ctstate |= trk ? MLX5_CT_STATE_TRK_BIT : 0;
ctstate |= est ? MLX5_CT_STATE_ESTABLISHED_BIT : 0;
......@@ -1258,6 +1266,20 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_match_add(struct mlx5_tc_ct_priv *priv,
ctstate_mask |= (untrk || trk) ? MLX5_CT_STATE_TRK_BIT : 0;
ctstate_mask |= (unest || est) ? MLX5_CT_STATE_ESTABLISHED_BIT : 0;
ctstate_mask |= (unrpl || rpl) ? MLX5_CT_STATE_REPLY_BIT : 0;
ctstate_mask |= unrel ? MLX5_CT_STATE_RELATED_BIT : 0;
ctstate_mask |= uninv ? MLX5_CT_STATE_INVALID_BIT : 0;
if (rel) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
"matching on ct_state +rel isn't supported");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
if (inv) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
"matching on ct_state +inv isn't supported");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
if (new) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment