Commit 1193829d authored by Yang Yang's avatar Yang Yang Committed by Linus Torvalds

delayacct: cleanup flags in struct task_delay_info and functions use it

Flags in struct task_delay_info is used to distinguish the difference
between swapin and blkio delay acountings.  But after patch "delayacct:
support swapin delay accounting for swapping without blkio", there is no
need to do that since swapin and blkio delay accounting use their own
functions.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211124065958.36703-1-yang.yang29@zte.com.cnSigned-off-by: default avatarYang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 82065b72
......@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT
struct task_delay_info {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
unsigned int flags; /* Private per-task flags */
/* For each stat XXX, add following, aligned appropriately
*
......@@ -74,18 +73,6 @@ extern void __delayacct_thrashing_end(void);
extern void __delayacct_swapin_start(void);
extern void __delayacct_swapin_end(void);
static inline void delayacct_set_flag(struct task_struct *p, int flag)
{
if (p->delays)
p->delays->flags |= flag;
}
static inline void delayacct_clear_flag(struct task_struct *p, int flag)
{
if (p->delays)
p->delays->flags &= ~flag;
}
static inline void delayacct_tsk_init(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
/* reinitialize in case parent's non-null pointer was dup'ed*/
......@@ -184,10 +171,6 @@ static inline void delayacct_swapin_end(void)
}
#else
static inline void delayacct_set_flag(struct task_struct *p, int flag)
{}
static inline void delayacct_clear_flag(struct task_struct *p, int flag)
{}
static inline void delayacct_init(void)
{}
static inline void delayacct_tsk_init(struct task_struct *tsk)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment