Commit 12025abd authored by Jun Miao's avatar Jun Miao Committed by Steven Rostedt (Google)

tracing: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context on RT kernel

When setting bootparams="trace_event=initcall:initcall_start tp_printk=1" in the
cmdline, the output_printk() was called, and the spin_lock_irqsave() was called in the
atomic and irq disable interrupt context suitation. On the PREEMPT_RT kernel,
these locks are replaced with sleepable rt-spinlock, so the stack calltrace will
be triggered.
Fix it by raw_spin_lock_irqsave when PREEMPT_RT and "trace_event=initcall:initcall_start
tp_printk=1" enabled.

 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: swapper/0
 preempt_count: 2, expected: 0
 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
 Preemption disabled at:
 [<ffffffff8992303e>] try_to_wake_up+0x7e/0xba0
 CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.1-rt17+ #19 34c5812404187a875f32bee7977f7367f9679ea7
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x8c
  dump_stack+0x10/0x12
  __might_resched.cold+0x11d/0x155
  rt_spin_lock+0x40/0x70
  trace_event_buffer_commit+0x2fa/0x4c0
  ? map_vsyscall+0x93/0x93
  trace_event_raw_event_initcall_start+0xbe/0x110
  ? perf_trace_initcall_finish+0x210/0x210
  ? probe_sched_wakeup+0x34/0x40
  ? ttwu_do_wakeup+0xda/0x310
  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x35/0x170
  ? map_vsyscall+0x93/0x93
  do_one_initcall+0x217/0x3c0
  ? trace_event_raw_event_initcall_level+0x170/0x170
  ? push_cpu_stop+0x400/0x400
  ? cblist_init_generic+0x241/0x290
  kernel_init_freeable+0x1ac/0x347
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x65/0x80
  ? rest_init+0xf0/0xf0
  kernel_init+0x1e/0x150
  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
  </TASK>

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220419013910.894370-1-jun.miao@intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJun Miao <jun.miao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
parent 69686fcb
......@@ -2835,7 +2835,7 @@ trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve(struct trace_buffer **current_rb,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tracepoint_iter_lock);
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(tracepoint_iter_lock);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(tracepoint_printk_mutex);
static void output_printk(struct trace_event_buffer *fbuffer)
......@@ -2863,14 +2863,14 @@ static void output_printk(struct trace_event_buffer *fbuffer)
event = &fbuffer->trace_file->event_call->event;
spin_lock_irqsave(&tracepoint_iter_lock, flags);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tracepoint_iter_lock, flags);
trace_seq_init(&iter->seq);
iter->ent = fbuffer->entry;
event_call->event.funcs->trace(iter, 0, event);
trace_seq_putc(&iter->seq, 0);
printk("%s", iter->seq.buffer);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tracepoint_iter_lock, flags);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tracepoint_iter_lock, flags);
}
int tracepoint_printk_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment