Commit 13ad1125 authored by Aharon Landau's avatar Aharon Landau Committed by Leon Romanovsky

RDMA/mlx5: Don't compare mkey tags in DEVX indirect mkey

According to the ib spec:
If the CI supports the Base Memory Management Extensions defined in this
specification, the L_Key format must consist of:
24 bit index in the most significant bits of the R_Key, and
8 bit key in the least significant bits of the R_Key
Through a successful Allocate L_Key verb invocation, the CI must let the
consumer own the key portion of the returned R_Key

Therefore, when creating a mkey using DEVX, the consumer is allowed to
change the key part. The kernel should compare only the index part of a
R_Key to determine equality with another R_Key.

Adding capability in order not to break backward compatibility.

Fixes: 534fd7aa ("IB/mlx5: Manage indirection mkey upon DEVX flow for ODP")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3d669aacea85a3a15c3b3b953b3eaba3f80ef9be.1659255945.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAharon Landau <aharonl@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLeon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
parent 19d6214a
......@@ -1826,6 +1826,9 @@ static int set_ucontext_resp(struct ib_ucontext *uctx,
if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, drain_sigerr))
resp->comp_mask |= MLX5_IB_ALLOC_UCONTEXT_RESP_MASK_SQD2RTS;
resp->comp_mask |=
MLX5_IB_ALLOC_UCONTEXT_RESP_MASK_MKEY_UPDATE_TAG;
return 0;
}
......
......@@ -795,7 +795,8 @@ static bool mkey_is_eq(struct mlx5_ib_mkey *mmkey, u32 key)
{
if (!mmkey)
return false;
if (mmkey->type == MLX5_MKEY_MW)
if (mmkey->type == MLX5_MKEY_MW ||
mmkey->type == MLX5_MKEY_INDIRECT_DEVX)
return mlx5_base_mkey(mmkey->key) == mlx5_base_mkey(key);
return mmkey->key == key;
}
......
......@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ enum mlx5_ib_alloc_ucontext_resp_mask {
MLX5_IB_ALLOC_UCONTEXT_RESP_MASK_ECE = 1UL << 2,
MLX5_IB_ALLOC_UCONTEXT_RESP_MASK_SQD2RTS = 1UL << 3,
MLX5_IB_ALLOC_UCONTEXT_RESP_MASK_REAL_TIME_TS = 1UL << 4,
MLX5_IB_ALLOC_UCONTEXT_RESP_MASK_MKEY_UPDATE_TAG = 1UL << 5,
};
enum mlx5_user_cmds_supp_uhw {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment