Commit 14274d0b authored by Peter Hilber's avatar Peter Hilber Committed by Thomas Gleixner

timekeeping: Fix cross-timestamp interpolation for non-x86

So far, get_device_system_crosststamp() unconditionally passes
system_counterval.cycles to timekeeping_cycles_to_ns(). But when
interpolating system time (do_interp == true), system_counterval.cycles is
before tkr_mono.cycle_last, contrary to the timekeeping_cycles_to_ns()
expectations.

On x86, CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_VALIDATE_LAST_CYCLE will mitigate on
interpolating, setting delta to 0. With delta == 0, xtstamp->sys_monoraw
and xtstamp->sys_realtime are then set to the last update time, as
implicitly expected by adjust_historical_crosststamp(). On other
architectures, the resulting nonsense xtstamp->sys_monoraw and
xtstamp->sys_realtime corrupt the xtstamp (ts) adjustment in
adjust_historical_crosststamp().

Fix this by deriving xtstamp->sys_monoraw and xtstamp->sys_realtime from
the last update time when interpolating, by using the local variable
"cycles". The local variable already has the right value when
interpolating, unlike system_counterval.cycles.

Fixes: 2c756feb ("time: Add history to cross timestamp interface supporting slower devices")
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: default avatarJohn Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231218073849.35294-4-peter.hilber@opensynergy.com
parent 87a41130
......@@ -1261,10 +1261,8 @@ int get_device_system_crosststamp(int (*get_time_fn)
tk_core.timekeeper.offs_real);
base_raw = tk->tkr_raw.base;
nsec_real = timekeeping_cycles_to_ns(&tk->tkr_mono,
system_counterval.cycles);
nsec_raw = timekeeping_cycles_to_ns(&tk->tkr_raw,
system_counterval.cycles);
nsec_real = timekeeping_cycles_to_ns(&tk->tkr_mono, cycles);
nsec_raw = timekeeping_cycles_to_ns(&tk->tkr_raw, cycles);
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&tk_core.seq, seq));
xtstamp->sys_realtime = ktime_add_ns(base_real, nsec_real);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment