Commit 14676ec6 authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä Committed by Jani Nikula

drm/i915: Fix cdclk vs. dev_cdclk mess when not recomputing things

When we end up not recomputing the cdclk, we need to populate
intel_state->cdclk with the "atomic_cdclk_freq" instead of the
current cdclk_freq. When no pipes are active, the actual cdclk_freq
may be lower than what the configuration of the planes and
pipes would require from the point of view of the software state.

This fixes bogus WARNS from skl_max_scale() which is trying to check
the plane software state against the cdclk frequency. So any time
it got called during DPMS off for instance, we might have tripped
the warn if the current mode would have required a higher than
minimum cdclk.

v2: Drop the dev_cdclk stuff (Maarten)

Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: bruno.pagani@ens-lyon.org
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Joseph Yasi <joe.yasi@gmail.com>
Tested-by: default avatarPaul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Tested-by: Joseph Yasi <joe.yasi@gmail.com> (v1)
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.6+
Fixes: 1a617b77 ("drm/i915: Keep track of the cdclk as if all crtc's were active.")
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98214Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479141311-11904-2-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
(cherry picked from commit e0ca7a6b)
Signed-off-by: default avatarJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
parent 99101574
......@@ -13994,8 +13994,9 @@ static int intel_modeset_checks(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("New cdclk calculated to be atomic %u, actual %u\n",
intel_state->cdclk, intel_state->dev_cdclk);
} else
} else {
to_intel_atomic_state(state)->cdclk = dev_priv->atomic_cdclk_freq;
}
intel_modeset_clear_plls(state);
......@@ -14096,8 +14097,9 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
if (ret)
return ret;
} else
intel_state->cdclk = dev_priv->cdclk_freq;
} else {
intel_state->cdclk = dev_priv->atomic_cdclk_freq;
}
ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_planes(dev, state);
if (ret)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment