Commit 15fc156f authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä

drm/i915: Probe whether SAGV works on pre-icl

Instead of leaving the SAGV enable/disable to the first commit
let's try to disable it first thing to see if we can do it or
not (disabling SAGV is a safe thing to at any time). This avoids
running the code in this funny intermediate state where we don't
know if SAGV is available or not.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220309164948.10671-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: default avatarStanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
parent c0074e71
......@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@
#include "vlv_sideband.h"
#include "../../../platform/x86/intel_ips.h"
static int intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
struct drm_i915_clock_gating_funcs {
void (*init_clock_gating)(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
};
......@@ -3697,6 +3699,18 @@ intel_sagv_block_time(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
static void intel_sagv_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
if (!intel_has_sagv(i915))
i915->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
/*
* Probe to see if we have working SAGV control.
* For icl+ this was already determined by intel_bw_init_hw().
*/
if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 11)
intel_disable_sagv(i915);
drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, i915->sagv_status == I915_SAGV_UNKNOWN);
i915->sagv_block_time_us = intel_sagv_block_time(i915);
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "SAGV supported: %s, original SAGV block time: %u us\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment