Commit 163b438b authored by hongnanli's avatar hongnanli Committed by Richard Weinberger

fs/jffs2: fix comments mentioning i_mutex

inode->i_mutex has been replaced with inode->i_rwsem long ago. Fix
comments still mentioning i_mutex.
Signed-off-by: default avatarhongnanli <hongnan.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
parent c3c07fc2
......@@ -18,11 +18,11 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
struct jffs2_inode_info {
/* We need an internal mutex similar to inode->i_mutex.
/* We need an internal mutex similar to inode->i_rwsem.
Unfortunately, we can't used the existing one, because
either the GC would deadlock, or we'd have to release it
before letting GC proceed. Or we'd have to put ugliness
into the GC code so it didn't attempt to obtain the i_mutex
into the GC code so it didn't attempt to obtain the i_rwsem
for the inode(s) which are already locked */
struct mutex sem;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment