Commit 18d8cb64 authored by Paul E. McKenney's avatar Paul E. McKenney

timers: Reduce future __run_timers() latency for first add to empty list

The __run_timers() function currently steps through the list one jiffy at
a time in order to update the timer wheel.  However, if the timer wheel
is empty, no adjustment is needed other than updating ->timer_jiffies.
Therefore, just before we add a timer to an empty timer wheel, we should
mark the timer wheel as being up to date.  This marking will reduce (and
perhaps eliminate) the jiffy-stepping that a future __run_timers() call
will need to do in response to some future timer posting or migration.
This commit therefore updates ->timer_jiffies for this case.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Acked-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
parent 16d937f8
...@@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ __internal_add_timer(struct tvec_base *base, struct timer_list *timer) ...@@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ __internal_add_timer(struct tvec_base *base, struct timer_list *timer)
static void internal_add_timer(struct tvec_base *base, struct timer_list *timer) static void internal_add_timer(struct tvec_base *base, struct timer_list *timer)
{ {
(void)catchup_timer_jiffies(base);
__internal_add_timer(base, timer); __internal_add_timer(base, timer);
/* /*
* Update base->active_timers and base->next_timer * Update base->active_timers and base->next_timer
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment