Commit 19177e7d authored by Veaceslav Falico's avatar Veaceslav Falico Committed by David S. Miller

bonding: make __get_active_agg() use bond_for_each_slave()

Currently we're relying on suboptimal construct

for (; aggregator; aggregator = __get_next_agg(aggregator)) {

where aggregator is an argument of __get_active_agg() which is _always_ the
first slave's aggregator - judging by all the callers, comments in the
ad_agg_selection_logic() and by logic.

Convert it to use the standard bond_for_each_slave().

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 3e36bb75
......@@ -720,16 +720,15 @@ static u32 __get_agg_bandwidth(struct aggregator *aggregator)
*/
static struct aggregator *__get_active_agg(struct aggregator *aggregator)
{
struct aggregator *retval = NULL;
struct bonding *bond = aggregator->slave->bond;
struct list_head *iter;
struct slave *slave;
for (; aggregator; aggregator = __get_next_agg(aggregator)) {
if (aggregator->is_active) {
retval = aggregator;
break;
}
}
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter)
if (SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).aggregator.is_active)
return &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).aggregator);
return retval;
return NULL;
}
/**
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment