Commit 196da974 authored by Kenneth Klette Jonassen's avatar Kenneth Klette Jonassen Committed by David S. Miller

tcp: move struct tcp_sacktag_state to tcp_ack()

Later patch passes two values set in tcp_sacktag_one() to
tcp_clean_rtx_queue(). Prepare passing them via struct tcp_sacktag_state.
Acked-by: default avatarYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKenneth Klette Jonassen <kennetkl@ifi.uio.no>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 10308220
......@@ -1634,7 +1634,7 @@ static int tcp_sack_cache_ok(const struct tcp_sock *tp, const struct tcp_sack_bl
static int
tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
u32 prior_snd_una, long *sack_rtt_us)
u32 prior_snd_una, struct tcp_sacktag_state *state)
{
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
const unsigned char *ptr = (skb_transport_header(ack_skb) +
......@@ -1642,7 +1642,6 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
struct tcp_sack_block_wire *sp_wire = (struct tcp_sack_block_wire *)(ptr+2);
struct tcp_sack_block sp[TCP_NUM_SACKS];
struct tcp_sack_block *cache;
struct tcp_sacktag_state state;
struct sk_buff *skb;
int num_sacks = min(TCP_NUM_SACKS, (ptr[1] - TCPOLEN_SACK_BASE) >> 3);
int used_sacks;
......@@ -1650,9 +1649,8 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
int i, j;
int first_sack_index;
state.flag = 0;
state.reord = tp->packets_out;
state.rtt_us = -1L;
state->flag = 0;
state->reord = tp->packets_out;
if (!tp->sacked_out) {
if (WARN_ON(tp->fackets_out))
......@@ -1663,7 +1661,7 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
found_dup_sack = tcp_check_dsack(sk, ack_skb, sp_wire,
num_sacks, prior_snd_una);
if (found_dup_sack)
state.flag |= FLAG_DSACKING_ACK;
state->flag |= FLAG_DSACKING_ACK;
/* Eliminate too old ACKs, but take into
* account more or less fresh ones, they can
......@@ -1728,7 +1726,7 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
}
skb = tcp_write_queue_head(sk);
state.fack_count = 0;
state->fack_count = 0;
i = 0;
if (!tp->sacked_out) {
......@@ -1762,10 +1760,10 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
/* Head todo? */
if (before(start_seq, cache->start_seq)) {
skb = tcp_sacktag_skip(skb, sk, &state,
skb = tcp_sacktag_skip(skb, sk, state,
start_seq);
skb = tcp_sacktag_walk(skb, sk, next_dup,
&state,
state,
start_seq,
cache->start_seq,
dup_sack);
......@@ -1776,7 +1774,7 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
goto advance_sp;
skb = tcp_maybe_skipping_dsack(skb, sk, next_dup,
&state,
state,
cache->end_seq);
/* ...tail remains todo... */
......@@ -1785,12 +1783,12 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
skb = tcp_highest_sack(sk);
if (!skb)
break;
state.fack_count = tp->fackets_out;
state->fack_count = tp->fackets_out;
cache++;
goto walk;
}
skb = tcp_sacktag_skip(skb, sk, &state, cache->end_seq);
skb = tcp_sacktag_skip(skb, sk, state, cache->end_seq);
/* Check overlap against next cached too (past this one already) */
cache++;
continue;
......@@ -1800,12 +1798,12 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
skb = tcp_highest_sack(sk);
if (!skb)
break;
state.fack_count = tp->fackets_out;
state->fack_count = tp->fackets_out;
}
skb = tcp_sacktag_skip(skb, sk, &state, start_seq);
skb = tcp_sacktag_skip(skb, sk, state, start_seq);
walk:
skb = tcp_sacktag_walk(skb, sk, next_dup, &state,
skb = tcp_sacktag_walk(skb, sk, next_dup, state,
start_seq, end_seq, dup_sack);
advance_sp:
......@@ -1820,9 +1818,9 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
for (j = 0; j < used_sacks; j++)
tp->recv_sack_cache[i++] = sp[j];
if ((state.reord < tp->fackets_out) &&
if ((state->reord < tp->fackets_out) &&
((inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Loss) || tp->undo_marker))
tcp_update_reordering(sk, tp->fackets_out - state.reord, 0);
tcp_update_reordering(sk, tp->fackets_out - state->reord, 0);
tcp_mark_lost_retrans(sk);
tcp_verify_left_out(tp);
......@@ -1834,8 +1832,7 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
WARN_ON((int)tp->retrans_out < 0);
WARN_ON((int)tcp_packets_in_flight(tp) < 0);
#endif
*sack_rtt_us = state.rtt_us;
return state.flag;
return state->flag;
}
/* Limits sacked_out so that sum with lost_out isn't ever larger than
......@@ -3459,6 +3456,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
{
struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
struct tcp_sacktag_state sack_state;
u32 prior_snd_una = tp->snd_una;
u32 ack_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq;
u32 ack = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ack_seq;
......@@ -3467,7 +3465,8 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
int prior_packets = tp->packets_out;
const int prior_unsacked = tp->packets_out - tp->sacked_out;
int acked = 0; /* Number of packets newly acked */
long sack_rtt_us = -1L;
sack_state.rtt_us = -1L;
/* We very likely will need to access write queue head. */
prefetchw(sk->sk_write_queue.next);
......@@ -3531,7 +3530,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked)
flag |= tcp_sacktag_write_queue(sk, skb, prior_snd_una,
&sack_rtt_us);
&sack_state);
if (tcp_ecn_rcv_ecn_echo(tp, tcp_hdr(skb))) {
flag |= FLAG_ECE;
......@@ -3556,7 +3555,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
/* See if we can take anything off of the retransmit queue. */
acked = tp->packets_out;
flag |= tcp_clean_rtx_queue(sk, prior_fackets, prior_snd_una,
sack_rtt_us);
sack_state.rtt_us);
acked -= tp->packets_out;
/* Advance cwnd if state allows */
......@@ -3608,7 +3607,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
*/
if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked) {
flag |= tcp_sacktag_write_queue(sk, skb, prior_snd_una,
&sack_rtt_us);
&sack_state);
tcp_fastretrans_alert(sk, acked, prior_unsacked,
is_dupack, flag);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment