Commit 199c36ea authored by Miao Xie's avatar Miao Xie Committed by Chris Mason

Btrfs: fix BUG_ON() caused by ENOSPC when relocating space

When we balanced the chunks across the devices, BUG_ON() in
__finish_chunk_alloc() was triggered.

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2568!
[SNIP]
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa049525e>] btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x8e/0xa0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04546b0>] do_chunk_alloc+0x330/0x3a0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa045c654>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb4/0x1f0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa045c86b>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xdb/0x350 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa048a8d8>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xd8/0x1d0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04476fd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x14d/0x5e0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa044660d>] ? read_block_for_search+0x14d/0x4d0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0447c9b>] btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x240 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa044dd5e>] btrfs_search_slot+0x49e/0x7a0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa044f07d>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x8d/0xf0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa045e973>] insert_with_overflow+0x43/0x110 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa045eb0d>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0xcd/0x1f0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0489bd0>] ? map_extent_buffer+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff812276ad>] ? rb_insert_color+0x9d/0x160
 [<ffffffffa046cc40>] ? inode_tree_add+0xf0/0x150 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0474801>] btrfs_add_link+0xc1/0x1c0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff811dacac>] ? security_inode_init_security+0x1c/0x30
 [<ffffffffa04a28aa>] ? btrfs_init_acl+0x4a/0x180 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa047492f>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x2f/0x70 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa046af16>] ? btrfs_init_inode_security+0x46/0x60 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0474ac0>] btrfs_create+0x150/0x1d0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff81159c63>] ? generic_permission+0x23/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8115b415>] vfs_create+0xa5/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8115ce6e>] do_last+0x5fe/0x880
 [<ffffffff8115dc0d>] path_openat+0xcd/0x3d0
 [<ffffffff8115e029>] do_filp_open+0x49/0xa0
 [<ffffffff8116a965>] ? alloc_fd+0x95/0x160
 [<ffffffff8114f0c7>] do_sys_open+0x107/0x1e0
 [<ffffffff810bcc3f>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1bf/0x1f0
 [<ffffffff8114f1e0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
 [<ffffffff81484ec2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[SNIP]
RIP  [<ffffffffa049444a>] __finish_chunk_alloc+0x20a/0x220 [btrfs]

The reason is:
Task1					Space balance task
do_chunk_alloc()
  __finish_chunk_alloc()
    update device info
    in the chunk tree
      alloc system metadata block
					relocate system metadata block group
					  set system metadata block group
					  readonly, This block group is the
					  only one that can allocate space. So
					  there is no free space that can be
					  allocated now.
        find no space and don't try
        to alloc new chunk, and then
        return ENOSPC
  BUG_ON() in __finish_chunk_alloc()
  was triggered.

Fix this bug by allocating a new system metadata chunk before relocating the
old one if we find there is no free space which can be allocated after setting
the old block group to be read-only.
Reported-by: default avatarTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: default avatarTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
parent f7aaa06b
......@@ -6526,15 +6526,28 @@ static u64 update_block_group_flags(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 flags)
return flags;
}
static int set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache)
static int set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, int force)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo = cache->space_info;
u64 num_bytes;
u64 min_allocable_bytes;
int ret = -ENOSPC;
if (cache->ro)
return 0;
/*
* We need some metadata space and system metadata space for
* allocating chunks in some corner cases until we force to set
* it to be readonly.
*/
if ((sinfo->flags &
(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA)) &&
!force)
min_allocable_bytes = 1 * 1024 * 1024;
else
min_allocable_bytes = 0;
spin_lock(&sinfo->lock);
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
num_bytes = cache->key.offset - cache->reserved - cache->pinned -
......@@ -6542,7 +6555,8 @@ static int set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache)
if (sinfo->bytes_used + sinfo->bytes_reserved + sinfo->bytes_pinned +
sinfo->bytes_may_use + sinfo->bytes_readonly +
cache->reserved_pinned + num_bytes <= sinfo->total_bytes) {
cache->reserved_pinned + num_bytes + min_allocable_bytes <=
sinfo->total_bytes) {
sinfo->bytes_readonly += num_bytes;
sinfo->bytes_reserved += cache->reserved_pinned;
cache->reserved_pinned = 0;
......@@ -6573,7 +6587,7 @@ int btrfs_set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_root *root,
do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, 2 * 1024 * 1024, alloc_flags,
CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
ret = set_block_group_ro(cache);
ret = set_block_group_ro(cache, 0);
if (!ret)
goto out;
alloc_flags = get_alloc_profile(root, cache->space_info->flags);
......@@ -6581,7 +6595,7 @@ int btrfs_set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_root *root,
CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = set_block_group_ro(cache);
ret = set_block_group_ro(cache, 0);
out:
btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
return ret;
......@@ -7018,7 +7032,7 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_root *root)
set_avail_alloc_bits(root->fs_info, cache->flags);
if (btrfs_chunk_readonly(root, cache->key.objectid))
set_block_group_ro(cache);
set_block_group_ro(cache, 1);
}
list_for_each_entry_rcu(space_info, &root->fs_info->space_info, list) {
......@@ -7032,9 +7046,9 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_root *root)
* mirrored block groups.
*/
list_for_each_entry(cache, &space_info->block_groups[3], list)
set_block_group_ro(cache);
set_block_group_ro(cache, 1);
list_for_each_entry(cache, &space_info->block_groups[4], list)
set_block_group_ro(cache);
set_block_group_ro(cache, 1);
}
init_global_block_rsv(info);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment