Commit 19fd80de authored by Jan Kara's avatar Jan Kara

udf: Handle error when adding extent to a file

When adding extent to a file fails, so far we've silently squelshed the
error. Make sure to propagate it up properly.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
parent 2b10074d
......@@ -57,15 +57,15 @@ static int udf_update_inode(struct inode *, int);
static int udf_sync_inode(struct inode *inode);
static int udf_alloc_i_data(struct inode *inode, size_t size);
static sector_t inode_getblk(struct inode *, sector_t, int *, int *);
static int8_t udf_insert_aext(struct inode *, struct extent_position,
struct kernel_lb_addr, uint32_t);
static int udf_insert_aext(struct inode *, struct extent_position,
struct kernel_lb_addr, uint32_t);
static void udf_split_extents(struct inode *, int *, int, udf_pblk_t,
struct kernel_long_ad *, int *);
static void udf_prealloc_extents(struct inode *, int, int,
struct kernel_long_ad *, int *);
static void udf_merge_extents(struct inode *, struct kernel_long_ad *, int *);
static void udf_update_extents(struct inode *, struct kernel_long_ad *, int,
int, struct extent_position *);
static int udf_update_extents(struct inode *, struct kernel_long_ad *, int,
int, struct extent_position *);
static int udf_get_block(struct inode *, sector_t, struct buffer_head *, int);
static void __udf_clear_extent_cache(struct inode *inode)
......@@ -793,7 +793,9 @@ static sector_t inode_getblk(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
/* write back the new extents, inserting new extents if the new number
* of extents is greater than the old number, and deleting extents if
* the new number of extents is less than the old number */
udf_update_extents(inode, laarr, startnum, endnum, &prev_epos);
*err = udf_update_extents(inode, laarr, startnum, endnum, &prev_epos);
if (*err < 0)
goto out_free;
newblock = udf_get_pblock(inode->i_sb, newblocknum,
iinfo->i_location.partitionReferenceNum, 0);
......@@ -1061,21 +1063,30 @@ static void udf_merge_extents(struct inode *inode, struct kernel_long_ad *laarr,
}
}
static void udf_update_extents(struct inode *inode, struct kernel_long_ad *laarr,
int startnum, int endnum,
struct extent_position *epos)
static int udf_update_extents(struct inode *inode, struct kernel_long_ad *laarr,
int startnum, int endnum,
struct extent_position *epos)
{
int start = 0, i;
struct kernel_lb_addr tmploc;
uint32_t tmplen;
int err;
if (startnum > endnum) {
for (i = 0; i < (startnum - endnum); i++)
udf_delete_aext(inode, *epos);
} else if (startnum < endnum) {
for (i = 0; i < (endnum - startnum); i++) {
udf_insert_aext(inode, *epos, laarr[i].extLocation,
laarr[i].extLength);
err = udf_insert_aext(inode, *epos,
laarr[i].extLocation,
laarr[i].extLength);
/*
* If we fail here, we are likely corrupting the extent
* list and leaking blocks. At least stop early to
* limit the damage.
*/
if (err < 0)
return err;
udf_next_aext(inode, epos, &laarr[i].extLocation,
&laarr[i].extLength, 1);
start++;
......@@ -1087,6 +1098,7 @@ static void udf_update_extents(struct inode *inode, struct kernel_long_ad *laarr
udf_write_aext(inode, epos, &laarr[i].extLocation,
laarr[i].extLength, 1);
}
return 0;
}
struct buffer_head *udf_bread(struct inode *inode, udf_pblk_t block,
......@@ -2105,12 +2117,13 @@ int8_t udf_current_aext(struct inode *inode, struct extent_position *epos,
return etype;
}
static int8_t udf_insert_aext(struct inode *inode, struct extent_position epos,
struct kernel_lb_addr neloc, uint32_t nelen)
static int udf_insert_aext(struct inode *inode, struct extent_position epos,
struct kernel_lb_addr neloc, uint32_t nelen)
{
struct kernel_lb_addr oeloc;
uint32_t oelen;
int8_t etype;
int err;
if (epos.bh)
get_bh(epos.bh);
......@@ -2120,10 +2133,10 @@ static int8_t udf_insert_aext(struct inode *inode, struct extent_position epos,
neloc = oeloc;
nelen = (etype << 30) | oelen;
}
udf_add_aext(inode, &epos, &neloc, nelen, 1);
err = udf_add_aext(inode, &epos, &neloc, nelen, 1);
brelse(epos.bh);
return (nelen >> 30);
return err;
}
int8_t udf_delete_aext(struct inode *inode, struct extent_position epos)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment